Skip to content

LETTER: Speaking of tall buildings, how about that Terminals plan?

Letter writer says the 24-storey condo tower planned for the Terminals building is 'not reasonable'
2023-03-28terminals002
An artist's rendering of the Collingwood Terminals redevelopment from the south facing north.

CollingwoodToday welcomes letters to the editor at [email protected] or via our website. Please include your daytime phone number and address (for verification of authorship, not publication). The following letters are in response to a suggestion in Collingwood's draft Official Plan to allow up to 6-storey buildings in some intersections in the downtown core and a plan for the Collingwood Terminals building involving a condo tower.

Editor,

There is a lot of opposition to allowing six-storey buildings in downtown Collingwood (including the Architecture Conservancy of Ontario). 

Can you imagine how people will feel when they get the Streetcar 24-storey monster built on their downtown waterfront? 

I haven't met a single person who likes their tower idea. Sure, some people want to keep the grain terminals but at what expense? 

Placing a 100-plus-foot condo tower on top of them does not seem like a reasonable expense to me.  I realize why Streetcar wants their condo tower (profit) but before more engineering monies are spent, shouldn't Collingwood consider a different option and/or partner if necessary? 

Can't we keep hotels and condos on our waterfront to a  four- or five-storey height? 

Perhaps there is a compromise between the two approaches?  Perhaps we all need to take a deep breath and brainstorm some more before the streetcar is too far down the track to Brampton, so to speak. 

Thanks very much,

Bob Tyssen
Collingwood, Ont.